Contact our news staff at (979) 245-5555.

 

County sued over beach plan

By William T. Wood
Bay City Tribune

Published August 28, 2003

BAY CITY — A group opposed to Matagorda County’s plan to close a half-mile stretch of Matagorda Beach to vehicle traffic filed a lawsuit Monday, then held a brief press conference on the courthouse steps.

The suit was filed in 130th District Court by the Matagorda Bays Committee of the Recreational Fishing Alliance (RFA) and D. Charles Menut, a resident of Matagorda.

The lawsuit accuses Matagorda County of violating the Texas Open Beaches Act when commissioners court approved a resolution amending the Matagorda County Dune Protection and Beach Access Plan on July 28.

That amendment allows for the creation of a half-mile-long pedestrian-only beach near the mouth of the Colorado River on Matagorda Beach.

The vehicle-free beach plan is supported by the Lower Colorado River Authority (LCRA), which plans to build the Matagorda Bay Nature Park on part of 1,600 acres it owns at the river’s mouth.

A second claim in Monday’s lawsuit contends the county also acted illegally Aug. 11 when commissioners court voted to lease 10.4 acres it owns on and around Jetty Park to LCRA.

Under the lease terms, LCRA will upgrade Jetty Park facilities and maintain them at its expense for 25 years.

The lawsuit argues that the lease also violates the Texas Open Beaches Act by limiting public access to the beach, causing damage to adjacent wetlands and provides inadequate parking.

During the press briefing after the lawsuit was filed, RFA representatives Patti McKelvy and Jim Smarr spoke briefly about their actions.

“We’re here to fight for our God-given rights to keep the beach open,” said Smarr, an RFA official.

McKelvy said she opposes the beach plan because of a lack of equal or better access points, parking issues and wetlands protection.

“The people of Texas, with the full support of RFA, do not intend to stand idly by while Matagorda County officials, ignoring their constituencies, hand over our beaches to LCRA and others for commercialization and eventual privatization,” said Menut, who is a party to the lawsuit.

County Attorney Jill Cornelius said Tuesday she is researching the Texas Open Beaches Act, and that the county has 20 days to file a response to the lawsuit.

“We believe the beach plan is well within the letter of the law. We took input from both the general land office and the attorney general’s office. We would not have sent anything up there that we knew was going to be rejected,” said County Judge Greg Westmoreland.

LCRA spokesman William McCann also responded to the lawsuit.

“LCRA bought the 1,600-acre tract at the Matagorda Peninsula in 2001 to provide a world-class education and recreational facility for the people of Texas, while helping to protect the natural beauty of the area.

“As a nonprofit conservation and reclamation district, LCRA did not buy the property to make money or to build high-rise hotels, as some have claimed.

“We want to make sure the Matagorda Bay Nature Park will enjoy the widest possible use.”

To allow families and students to safely use a small portion of the adjacent beach, McCann said, “we proposed earmarking half a mile for pedestrians only. The rest of the beach would continue to be open to vehicular traffic.”